
The Coalition are at it again: wrongly blaming the former Labor Government for the Budget’s woes, while completely ignoring the major role played by the Howard Government.
Last Monday, Prime Minister Tony Abbott exhorted:
“They didn’t just booby-trap the budget, they created a Ponzi scheme of unsustainable spending because they thought that new taxes, more spending and bigger bureaucracies were the answer to every problem’’.
In a similar vein, Treasurer Joe Hockey on Friday claimed:
“Australia has a serious spending problem. The problem at the heart of Labor’s legacy was excessive spending”…

Note also from the above chart that Budget revenues ballooned under the Howard Government, who presided over the most lucrative part of the resources boom when commodity prices and the terms-of-trade exploded, providing the key impetus for the rising disposable incomes (see next chart).

Nominal GDP is the dollar value of what’s produced and earned across the economy and is also the measure that drives federal taxation revenue. Due in part to the inexorable rise in the terms-of-trade, the Howard Government experienced ever growing nominal GDP growth as commodity prices surged, whereby it reaped the benefits of growing personal and company taxes, not to mention increased capital gains taxes as asset markets boomed. By comparison, the Rudd/Gillard Governments experienced two episodes where nominal GDP collapsed – both on account of falling commodity prices (see next chart).

Let’s also not forget that the Howard Government made the disastrous decision to halve the rate of capital gains tax (CGT), making property speculation even more fruitful. The decision on CGT also helped kick-off a boom in household debt, whereby debt levels literally exploded over the 11 years that Howard was Prime Minister (see next chart).

This extra demand (spending) by the household sector meant that the Howard Government was able to achieve higher growth and run bigger surpluses, without adversely affecting overall demand in the economy (see next chart).

By the time Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister in late-2007, the ratio of household debt to disposable income had flatlined as households dramatically lifted their savings rates. This deficiency of household demand (spending) effectively left a hole in the economy that had to be filled by increased Budget deficits by the Federal Government.
The truth is, both sides of politics are to blame for Australia’s deteriorating budgetary position. Both have made mistakes that will impact taxpayers for years to come.
If the Coalition wants to harness broad-based electoral support for reform, it needs to drop the politically motivated attacks and engage in an honest assessment of past mistakes, as well as provide a road map for the future.
Lumping all of the budgetary blame on Labor, while ignoring the Howard Government’s own largesse, is likely to breed cynicism and opposition, and stifle the nation’s progress.