Labor crowned king of government-funded jobs

Advertisement

We know that Australia’s economy is being increasingly driven by government spending.

Public demand forecast

Public demand as a share of GDP hit a record high 27.3% in the June quarter of 2024, and Westpac forecasts that its share of the economy will continue to grow:

Public demand by component
Advertisement

Much of this spending relates to the NDIS, which is growing in cost by around 20% annually and is projected by the Parliamentary Budget Office to cost around $100 billion annually in a decade:

NDIS spending

The government’s influence on the job market has been even more pronounced.

Advertisement

The Q2 2024 Labour Market Account from the ABS revealed that 268,000 jobs were created in government-funded roles in 2023-24, whereas only 33,000 jobs were created in the market sector (i.e., all other industries):

The following chart from CBA shows that the growth in healthcare & social assistance jobs in Australia has dwarfed other Anglosphere nations since 2021, reflecting the expansion of the NDIS:

Advertisement
Health employment

Most of these new roles have been caring jobs in the social assistance category:

Social assistance jobs
Advertisement

Independent economist Tarric Brooker has created the following chart tracking job growth across the first two years of the past seven Prime Ministers:

Newly minted jobs

According to Brooker, “Albo wins the crown for the highest level of non-market based jobs growth of any PM since records began”.

Advertisement

The number of government-funded (non-market) jobs ballooned by 13.8% in the first two years of the Albanese government, easily eclipsing the 10.6% growth recorded under the Rudd government and 9.0% recorded under the Turnbull government.

By contrast, the 1.9% growth in market-based jobs under the Albanese government ranks fairly poorly.

As I keep highlighting, the explosion in non-market jobs has both budgetary and productivity implications for Australia since they are funded largely via tax revenues, and the non-market sector has historically exhibited far poorer productivity growth than the market sector:

Advertisement
Non-market productivity growth

The expansion in public spending, therefore, necessarily means slower productivity growth for Australia:

Non-market productivity
Advertisement

The question follows: where will Australia’s future productivity growth come from?

About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.