Australia’s economy is unsustainable

Advertisement

Australia’s economy is on public sector life support.

The overwhelming majority (87%) of jobs created over the past two years have been in the non-market (government-funded) sector.

Employment growth by sector

Much of this job growth has been related to the NDIS, which has driven explosive growth in the healthcare and social assistance sector.

Health employment Health employment
Advertisement

“When governments, as they often do, point to strong employment figures to boast about the jobs they personally “created”, I typically roll my eyes”, said economist Steven Hamilton last month. “Under this government, however, the claim is literally true”.

A similar thing can be said for Australia’s GDP growth, which has overwhelmingly been driven by record public spending.

Expansion in public demand
Advertisement

The following chart from CBA summarises the situation, with Australian government spending rising 55% in real terms since 2015, whereas overall real GDP only grew by 22%.

Public demand vs GDP

Over the weekend, outgoing NDIS minister Bill Shorten took aim at economists questioning the efficacy and sustainability of the NDIS.

Advertisement

Shorten credited the NDIS for generating 500,000 jobs, driving Australia’s low unemployment rate, and keeping the economy out of recession.

“Since the formation of the NDIS, a new part of the Australian economy has been created”, Shorten said.

“The NDIS employs more people directly than the mining industry. It is an unsung hero of low unemployment and employment growth over the last decade since its creation”.

Advertisement

Interestingly, in a separate report, Shorten admitted that the 20% annual growth in the cost of the NDIS was unsustainable.

“We want to get outcomes for people with disability. But a scheme can’t keep growing at 20% per year”, he said.

In the same report, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also remarked that “the NDIS needs to be made sustainable”. 

Advertisement

Meanwhile, veteran budget watcher Chris Richardson lamented that the NDIS is heavily rorted.

“I would like to think I was an early champion of the NDIS”, Richardson said.

“The concept is magnificent, but we have set up a whole bunch of incentives for state governments, for individuals, doctors, for the clients, for providers, that begs people to do the wrong thing, and they do. It is heavily rorted”.

Advertisement

Richardson is correct, of course. In June 2024, the NDIS integrity chief told a Senate Committee that nine out of 10 plan managers surveyed showed signs of fraud and that the justice system would be overwhelmed if all the scams carried out were prosecuted.

NDIS fraud

“These are not genuine providers, not people who should be in business, not people who should be allowed near government schemes of any kind”, NDIS integrity chief John Dardo told senators.

Advertisement

Economist Steve Hamilton encapsulated the problem with the following testimony last month.

“The NDIS funds 610,000 recipients to the tune of $76,000 each on average per year, and under even the most wildly optimistic forecast this will double over the next 10 years”.

“Just to fund it today, we’d need to take an additional $3400 a year from every single Australian taxpayer, and in 10 years – well, you do the maths”.

The Parliamentary Budget Office projected that the NDIS could double in cost to around $100 billion in a decade, overtaking the annual cost of the aged pension.

NDIS cost
Advertisement

To exacerbate the situation, the NDIS-driven surge in non-market jobs has significantly reduced Australia’s labour productivity.

Labor productivity

The bottom line is that the NDIS is unsustainable, which, given its gargantuan size and impact, means the Australian economy is unsustainable.

Advertisement
About the author
Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. He is also a co-founder of MacroBusiness. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.